When a team can’t change #changemanagement
Posted by groupstrategy in Uncategorized on April 25, 2012
Recently I have been helping a company formulate a new strategic direction. The companies primary shareholder has had a major shift in their thinking and wants the company to shift their focus to a new customer segment, pretty much a 180 degree shift.
Now it is easy enough to develop a new strategy, objectives and milestones to meet the new mission but it isn’t easy to get the plan into action. Why?
Put simply the managment of the company has built a very strong culture, over more than a quarter of a century of existence, around the old product and market set. They have engaged staff in that journey and employed people who fit well within that framework. And they have used performance systems and rewards that are intimately linked to the old ways. Unfortunately there is now a lot of resistance to what the shareholder wants. Many companies have found themselves in such a position where a major change is required due to whatever pressures, have failed to adapt and have fallen by the wayside. Polariod is an excellent case study.
How to solve the problem?
Well nothing can be done overnight, even though that is what their shareholder is expecting, indeed demanding. Changing direction suddenly and with such a major impact requires fine tuning the engine of the organisation coupled with a lot of hard work and patience. Just saying what you want rarely makes it happen. In fact in this case it is having the opposite, and not unexpected effect, denial, anger and head long resistance from some employees. “Why change, we have been doing this for 20 plus years and it is working well. The shareholder doesn’t understand, lets show them they are wrong!”
Well what I am sure of is that taking your key shareholder head on is certainly not going to be a winning strategy!
So here are the steps I have recommended.
- Establish the role of Manager Organisational Development (title is not that important but the power you impart to it is)
- Make the new role report directly to the CEO, and have the CEO give it strong and visible support.
- Pick the most patient, most persistent and most energetic manager to fill the position – certainly one who embraces the new direction and importantly one known for getting results.
- Establish the outcomes, timeframes and responsibilites for delivery of the action and execution plans – do this in a collaborative framework utilising staff from all levels, agree what must be done, by when and by whom.
- Have timeframes short and make goals as simple as practical – it is easier then to ensure no claw back to the old ways, changes are sustained.
- Establish transparent reporting arrangements – make it easy to know how the change is actually going. This will conteract those peddling bad news.
- Communicate, communicate and communicate – the new direction, the reasons behind the change, the progress and the good news stories, have an open door so those seeking the real answers can get them and thus shut down the water cooler conversations.
- Celebrate the successes and reward those who make a positive difference.
This will generate energy and energise those who are ready to adopt the new direction. New opportunities, new ideas and a penchant to try them can make for an exciting place to work.
Of course some people will never change. Sadly, no matter how good they are at there job, it is best for them to move on.
Turning the ship requires a strong hand on the wheel and a close watch on drive train.
Making strategy stick
Posted by groupstrategy in Uncategorized on April 13, 2012
I think it was Winston Churchill who stated something to the effect, strategic plans are wonderful things but sometimes it doesn’t hurt to have a look at the results.
What he was in some ways getting at is that one of the big problems all organisations face is getting strategy executed. And if you don’t execute it is pretty hard to get results.
Jeroen De Flander, the author of Strategy Execution Heroes noted in his book that:
- 15% of people believe the strategies are the wrong ones.
- 30% don’t receive info on how to execute the strategy.
- 40% believe strategic initiatives are not staffed with the right people.
- 27% believe strategic initiatives are being managed correctly.
- 18% are unable to explain how to translate strategy or set individual objectives.
Pretty poor numbers by any measure!
Now couple that to change leadership group Prosci’s research on the impediments to change and you can soon see why so many plans fail to get executed.
They found over many years of research that the biggest obstacles to change are:
- Ineffective change management sponsorship from senior leaders
- Insufficient change management resourcing
- Resistance to change from employees
- Middle-management resistance
- Poor communication
Major shifts in strategic initiatives require strong change leadership to get them through. I have been advocating that the whole process can be made easier by involving those who will have to implement the strategies in the development of them. Of course in large organisations or those widely dispersed over the globe this is not allways practical. Sensitive change leadership will be a key skill that managers will need to get the strategies into place.
In my experience resistance at middle management has a major bearing on the success or otherwise of the organisation. Engaging change champions across all levels and locations of the organisation and giving them direct access to senior management goes a long way to lessening this hurdle. Harness the energy of those seeking change and make it easy for those sitting on the fence to come over to the new thinking.
So just because your team comes up with a great strategy, one that is going to help your business grow and prosper doesn’t mean that the entire team is going to welcome the new direction with open arms. Have a look at the issues above, work out which apply in your organisation and start implementing activities which will give the new strategic direction the best possible opportunity of seeing the light of day.
The old cliche - failing to plan is planning to fail is only part of the story, failing to plan and manage the implementation is just as big an issue as having no plan at all.
#strategyexecution – yes it is all in the delivery
Posted by groupstrategy in Uncategorized on March 7, 2012
Developing a strategy is fine but if you are not going to implement it properly then it is as often quoted – “vision without action is just a dream”
I read a good summary by American Daniel Kelley when the question was proposed to him “What is the most critical success factor for strategic management” and thought I should share it with you.
It can all be summed up in one word: Execution
Your Strategic Plan is where you DEFINE who you are, what you do and where you want to go. Strategic Goals are established; the Investment/Financial Plan is set; and innovation initiatives are identified and planned. Your Strategic Plan is your “call to action” which the company will follow to achieve your vision.
Your Operating Plan is your “action plan”. It is where your strategic plan is EXECUTED. It defines the measurable goals and their supporting initiatives, metrics, responsibilities and accountabilities are set in place for the next 3 years, 1 year and 90 days. Resources, human and otherwise, are planned and budgeted; innovation and growth strategies are funded; everyone in the company becomes aligned with your Core Values, and they support your Vision. Lastly, and most importantly, a Management System is put in place which focuses each department and each employee on their assigned priorities (which are tied to the Goals), measures and manages performance in real time, and demands accountability at the enterprise, department and employee level.
“A goal without a plan is just a wish” ― Antoine de Saint-Exupéry, The Little Prince
So there it is, get the implementation right, then the vision will be achieved.
How do you know if you have achieved success? #businesssuccess
Posted by groupstrategy in Uncategorized on February 26, 2012
Well you have what you think is a great business model, a sound marketing plan, believe you have got your pricing right and established the necessary channels, relationships, activities and resources to support your enterprise.
Success is assured, right?
History shows that what you think will work doesn’t always. And you might think that things are g0ing well but are they?
Ultimately there is only one true measure of success. Customers are the only true measure, if they are seeking your bundle of products and services to a level to allow you to sustain your business then you have achieved the first hurdle. From there you want to grow your business or operation.
But there are other key measures of success that you can observe to help you in monitoring your progress.
On top of your customers there are four other groups you need to impress to achieve success:
- your competitors: the harder they try to take your customers, the harder they try to poach your staff the more successful you are
- your suppliers: the more they want to be with you on your journey the more successful you are
- your shareholders: there continuing investment support the more successful you are
- your staff: the more they want to stay with you and encourage others to join with you the more successful you are
Of course this is only part of the story, but it is an important part. Monitoring these five components of success is something all good managers do.
Building strategy and setting milestones that help deliver these successes are critical components to achieving your long term objectives.
Be wary of just taking a short term customer only view.
The power of collaboration #strategy #visualmeetings
Posted by groupstrategy in Uncategorized on February 5, 2012
I love working with groups. The energy that emerges, the ideas that flow and the fun that people have in these environments is very rewarding.
I have been doing this for a lot of years, with a wide variety of audiences and one thing is clear – talking heads at the front of the room isn’t the best way to get action happening.
If you adopt a collaborative model then coming together with a common purpose has already set the scene before you start. Sure there will be some who don’t want to be there, some who are skeptical and some who want to see the process fail but inevitably those with the right mindsets prevail, they are the ones who get heard and get supported.
Ideas that are developed in a collaborative framework are generally both great, actionable and ulitmately actioned. This is clearly a more effective and efficient way to develop goals, strategies and to plan. It is what David Sibbet calls the learning cycle – imagine, engage, think, enact.
When I am doing this type of work I love to use visual aids, the type that the participants can use and can follow. Not animated multi media power point aids, if I need to use AV then I prefer to use Prezi which builds energy and interest into the presentation. No – what I really prefer is hand drawn visual aids. Mind maps, post-it notes, large paper templates, colored pens and white boards. Much easier to use, much easier to adapt to the flow of the meeting/workshop and easily transferred into the meeting notes that go out later. And given that either the participants or the facilitator is collecting the ideas of everyone who is participating then engagement from the attendees is a natural outcome.
Ideas feed of others, plans get built, people aren’t frightened to participate.
Outcome = progress and results. Less defering items for decsision, less reasons for not doing something, less procrastination, more positive discussion, more go forward decisions.
This all adds up to productivity, positive energy and big picture thinking.
I bet y0u wished this was a description of the meetings and workshops that you have to attend! It isn’t that hard – you should try it next time you get a chance! Any questions, just ask.
Why How What and the strategy model.
Posted by groupstrategy in Uncategorized on January 17, 2012
Readers of my posts will know that I am a big fan of Simon Sinek and his book “Start With Why”. Groups, teams or organisations who struggle to articulate their WHY probably also struggle with how to stay ahead of the game, choose strategies and implement actions that support their beliefs.
SoI have been working on laying the WHY model over the Strategy Model and see where I believe they fit together.
I think that the WHY of the organisation or group can be covered by their whole ecosystem, their whole reason for being, their now and their future.
When looking at your own situation if the desired WHY and the model don’t align then either the WHY isn’t what you thought you believed or your strategy isn’t taking you there! And vice versa.
If you have alignment then the actions that you are taking to get you to your desired goals and objectives (thoses things most closely linked to your WHAT) will be easily articulated and more readily accomplished.
And finally HOW, these, I believe, are aligned to the enablers or pathways that help us make the actions happen.
So what do you think? Do the WHY model and the Strategic Planning model interlink just like a puzzle coming together, or is there no need to complicate each with the other? Let me know what you think?
#strategicplanning #simonsinek
Time to Review and Renew – the 10 things envelope #plan #strategy
Posted by groupstrategy in Uncategorized on January 5, 2012
One of the things I encourage people to do at my workshops is to set personal goals. It is a great ice breaker and gets people focused on the future.
I ask them to write down 10 things they would like to achieve in the next twelve months, place it in an envelope and date it.
There are no boundaries to what people are allowed to write, it can be professional development right through to relationships or financial gain. And importantly it is private, no one is asked to share what they have written!
It is amazing how many of those objectives people find they have achieved when they break open their envelope after twelve months and review the year just gone. Better than 50% of the objectives are usually met and a typical benchmark is closer to 80%.
So if you have been to one of my workshops where we have done this it may be time to Review and Renew. (And if you haven’t then start with an envelope now!)
Review how you went over the last twelve months and repeat the process so you Renew your objectives for the next twelve.
It only takes a few minutes, go on do it now before some pressing item comes across your desk! Oh, and put a diary entry in for twelve months time so you remember to Review and Renew every year!
No team goals = no team mindset = no team outcomes #teams
Posted by groupstrategy in Uncategorized on December 7, 2011
Team leaders are often frustrated by their team not getting behind the goals and vision the leader has, not contributing to developing these goals and vision and the team not therefore reaching it’s full potential.
Executing any plan requires buy in from those who have to execute and deliver the plan. The best way to get buy in is to have the team develop the plan together.
Of course this is fine for small teams but is much harder to achieve where teams are large and / or geogrpahically spread.
There are a few key things to remember when executing with teams.
* teams are made up of people with various motivations, needs and mindsets. There will be those who welcome and race for change, the early adopters, right through to the recalitrants, those who will resist at all costs. Harness the early adopters!
* teams that develop the plan together are more likely to execute the plan. They will understand the case for change because they identified it. They will sell the case for change also.
* in large and geographically dispersed teams empower change agents within geographic or organisational areas and provide them with the training and information to sell the plan
* communicate, communicate, communicate. Don’t let the rumours and water cooler conversations become the gospel. Open, honest and factual at all times is best.
* celebrate the wins
* focus on the end game, monitor progress and reward positive outcomes
Make plan execution a team sport, a fun activity and energise your team to be winners. Ask them the question, ‘how do you want others to see and speak about our team?’
And I am a firm believer that change is lead not managed!
So set the team energised in developing the team goals. Only with team goals will you have team behaviour.
Going forward but looking backwards – a recipe for disaster #strategy
Posted by groupstrategy in Uncategorized on November 28, 2011
When I was in charge of organisation development in a major company I had to undertake exit interviews when staff left our employment.
I can still remember one young employee, one very good at his job, telling me he couldn’t work for his boss anymore. He explained it was like sitting in the back seat of a car with his boss driving but looking out the back window of the car rather than the windscreen.
A little more research told me he wasn’t making it up. I moved his boss into a new role and put someone in charge of those staff who could lead.
So what is the story here?
Well, in this fast paced changing world you can’t be someone who is looking out the rear window. Sure it has some lessons you can learn but don’t spend too much time there, just use the rearview to seek predictable patterns, particularly from more mature markets! You need to be future ready not past wise.
Being future ready means searching out innovation and innovative ideas, collaborating with colleagues and peers and testing theories and models, particularly with your customers.
Testing means destroying mind sets and challenging sacred cows. Testing means looking at new business models, new markets, new entrants, new pricing structures, resource failures or constraints, partner failures …………… Lots of looking up the road asking what if?
As the great blues guitarist BB King sang, “You better not look down if you want to keep on flying, put the hammer down, don’t look back”
Business strategy without business modelling – it could be ugly #bmgen
Posted by groupstrategy in Uncategorized on November 16, 2011
There has been some on-line discussion about the difference between buisness strategy and business modelling.
Well clearly there is a difference. Strategy is around the tactics and actions you are going to put into place to reach your goals and objectives. Modelling is around how all the “operational” components of your business fit together, customers, channels, relationships, resources, activities and partners all linked through your value proposition(s) to deliver your goals and objectives. See the connection?
The best business modelling tool I have used is the Business Model Canvas developed by Alex Osterwalder. Here is a link to a great two minute video showing all about it. I strongly recommend you take the time to look at it.
What is evident is, that to develop sound strategies for the medium to long term you need to innovate your business model.
Broadly speaking you need to take the Canvas and firstly build the model as it is today. You then dissect & innovate the “as is” model having reviewed your business environment to develop a hypothesis, or two or three, on what tomorrows environment might look like. This is then translated into the Canvas, or a number of Canvases to present visual representation(s) of potential future business model(s). Preferably, if practical, you then test the model(s) and ultimately choose one. You then translate the preferred hypothesis into the new business strategy. One based upon logical analysis which has challenged the status quo.
(One colleague suggests, as a method of developing innovative thinking, taking the “as is” model and removing components (post-its) systematically from each of the 9 boxes to make you take a realistic view of your environment and to break any paradigms that might exist. Not a bad approach if your team are stuck developing the future hypotheses.)
Once you have innovated your business model you are in a position to develop the pathways to success and the strategies you need to reach the goals and objectives.
Sure, there are lots of ways of developing business strategy, but a disciplined approach using business model innovation within a collaborative framework does, based on our experience, elicit some of the best plans.
So yes, business strategy and business modelling are different, but they go together like a hand fits in a glove!
We are passionate about strategic planning and business model innovation, your questions are always gladly received.

